History & Overview Annual Report President's Pages Center News Community Affairs
Make a Gift Yankees Universe Fund Fred's Team Cycle for Survival Thomas Blake Sr. Memorial Research Fund Donating Blood & Platelets Volunteering Thrift Shop Park Avenue Potluck Cookbook
Press Releases Information for Journalists News@MSKCC
Manhattan New Jersey Long Island Westchester
Working at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Work Sites College Recruitment About Nursing Job Fairs & Career Days Job Search & Apply Online
Making an Appointment
Elizabeth Morris & David Dershaw
Elizabeth Morris, Director of Breast MRI at Memorial Sloan-Kettering, and David Dershaw, Memorial Sloan-Kettering's Director of Breast Imaging.

Recent American Cancer Society guidelines and a New England Journal of Medicine study support MRI screening as a supplement to mammography, but only for women at high risk for developing breast cancer.

New screening guidelines from the American Cancer Society (ACS) and a study in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) call for expanded use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to detect breast cancer. However, both the guidelines and the study address themselves to specific, limited populations -- women who are at high risk for breast cancer and women who have a newly diagnosed cancer in one breast. MRI is a diagnostic procedure that uses magnets and radio waves to produce detailed images of the body, including the breast, and can be more sensitive than mammography.

Results of the NEJM study, published in the March 29 issue, found that for women with newly diagnosed cancer in one breast, MRI screening of the opposite (contralateral) breast can identify tumors that a mammogram may miss. The National Cancer Institute-funded multi-institutional study included 969 women recently diagnosed with cancer in one breast, with no abnormalities detected in the contralateral breast either by mammography or by clinical examination. These women were screened with MRI, and in 30 women -- or three percent of the group -- MRI detected contralateral breast cancer that had been missed by mammography. [PubMed Abstract]

"The NEJM study confirms data and numbers that have previously been reported from Memorial Sloan-Kettering and other institutions," said Memorial Sloan-Kettering's Director of Breast Imaging D. David Dershaw. The Center has long been at the forefront of MR breast imaging. "Hedvig Hricak [Chair of the Department of Radiology] had the foresight to suspect that MR might be very valuable in breast disease. Her support and her opening up the technology to us have made our work at Memorial Sloan-Kettering possible," Dr. Dershaw said.

(Left) A mammogram of a 41-year-old woman who tested positive for the BRCA-2 gene mutation shows nothing. (Right) An MRI of the same breast reveals a mass in the breast near the chest wall. A biopsy showed the mass was a 9 millimeter invasive ductal carcinoma.

Although the NEJM study suggests the need for one MRI in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer, new ACS guidelines recommend annual MRI screening for some women. In these guidelines, published in the April issue of CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, screening recommendations for women at only average risk for developing breast cancer remain unchanged: annual clinical breast examination and mammography beginning at age 40. But for women with a 20 to 25 percent or greater lifetime risk of developing breast cancer, the ACS now recommends yearly screening starting at age 30 using MRI in addition to mammography. The ACS defines women at high risk of developing breast cancer as women who have mutations of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes or who have a first-degree relative (parent, sibling, or child) with such a mutation. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are genes that, when mutated, can significantly increase an individual's risk of breast cancer. Women who received radiation to the chest for treatment of childhood cancers such as Hodgkin's disease are also classified as high risk, as are women with certain cancer predisposition syndromes.

Yet even given these parameters, calculating risk is not a simple proposition. "Most women overestimate their risk and aren't familiar with risk models, which are constantly being updated," noted Elizabeth A. Morris, Director of Breast MRI at the Center and a member of the panel that drew up the ACS guidelines. "They need to talk to their doctors to figure out what their true risk is."

Work done at Memorial Sloan-Kettering has been important in developing a consensus on the increasingly important role of MRI in breast cancer screening. Continuing efforts at the Center will help to determine if additional women should be screened with MRI. "At Memorial Sloan-Kettering, we're a bit more aggressive about who we include in our high-risk screening than the ACS recommendations," elaborated Dr. Morris. "We will screen not only BRCA1 and 2 patients, but also relatives of those patients and women who have a personal history of breast cancer if it was diagnosed pre- or perimenopausally. We'll also screen women with lobular carcinoma in situ, which is not actually a cancer but a marker that means a woman is at high risk for developing an invasive cancer during her lifetime." Women with a strong family history of the disease and women with ductal carcinoma in situ and growths called atypical hyperplasia also qualify for screening at Memorial Sloan-Kettering.

While the benefits of MRI screening in certain women have been demonstrated, the increased sensitivity of the scans can produce false positive readings, which may lead to additional scans, unnecessary biopsies, and anxiety in patients. "This is the reason for the current limitation of MRI screening to women at very high risk," explained Dr. Dershaw. "The likelihood that a positive MR is due to a cancer is higher in women who have a higher risk of cancer. That's why we don't want to screen women at low risk, because we would do lots of biopsies and find very little cancer. There is now the recognition that screening for breast cancer should not be the same for everybody but should be based on a woman's individual risk of developing breast cancer."


PrintEmail This Page